UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICAN

They forgot to include the word “possibly” in that headline. It will only “shake women’s sports” in any manner if SCOTUS fails to recognize that Title IX – a landmark “federal civil rights law in the United States was enacted as part of the Education Amendments of 1972. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government.” In 1972, the mental illness of ‘sex choice’ was not an issue. The sex of “women” is – and has always been – female!

The only test for determination of eligibility in “women’s sports”, must be based upon DNA. “The Male and Female DNA differs primarily in the sex chromosomes: males have one X and one Y chromosome (XY), while females have two X chromosomes (XX). This difference in chromosomes influences the development of sexual characteristics and traits.” If a male (XY chromosomes) wishes to fantasize he is a woman, it should be recognized as a psychotic break with reality, and recognition is NOT the same as AGREEMENT/SUPPORT of that fantasy. Fantasies are the product of an impaired mind, and should NOT be supported by the general public. Recognized, yes… supported NO!

Let the transsexual’s choice, permit them to compete against other transsexuals… if they wish to compete. Anything other than that, offends our sense of smell, not to mention our intelligence.  
The British Supreme Court has confirmed that inclusion and non-discrimination must be balanced against legitimate interests such as fair play and safety — principles that have been long upheld in sport. 

The ruling supports a more tailored, evidence-based approach — allowing national governing bodies to impose proportionate eligibility requirements without contravening equality laws.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to review whether state laws can ban transgender athletes from competing in women’s and girls’ sports.

The case concerns laws in Idaho and West Virginia, where two transgender students won injunctions from lower courts allowing them to continue competing.

How the top court rules could have significant implications across the country.

It comes two weeks after the conservative majority court upheld a Tennessee law that bans gender transition care for young people – a ruling that some advocates say delivered a major blow to transgender rights in the US. The Supreme Court will review the cases of Becky Pepper-Jackson, 15, and Lindsay Hecox, 24, who successfully challenged state bans in West Virginia and Idaho by arguing they were discriminatory. Laws are discriminatory only within the letter of the law, it would be truly discriminatory if it permits men to compete against women in competitive sports. DNA MUST BE THE TEST IN COMPETITIVE SPORTS!

YOUR THOUGHTS??