
Tribalization of a population, is common within free nations in which the people have the right to freely express their thoughts and beliefs… even if such expressions find fault with said governance. However, being human those who govern do not possess unlimited patience. In North America, there are the significant “tribes”, which are commonly identified as Conservatives, Socialists and Islamists. Conservatives and Socialists are ideologically and diametrically opposed. The Conservative ideology is based upon individual rights, freedom being primary among those rights. Socialism is designed as an entry point to Communism (the foundational principles of each are largely derived from the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, particularly the belief that history is driven by class struggles and that a proletarian revolution is necessary to achieve equality and social justice.). The third tribe, which is Islam, is identified as such due to the spread of that Theo- political, and their intent to gain control of the entire world.
Theoretically – if they could ever unify – there could be a tribe defined by skin color, in which blacks, browns and ‘yellows’ would consolidate and compromise upon their desires and efforts, and gain tribal significance. Today, there is no such unity, and individually they lack significance other than at the voting polls.

I believe our population may be somewhat balanced, due to 40 years of emphasizing Socialism throughout our educational system. The education/indoctrination order of the day become “Socialism good! Capitalism evil!” Capitalism provides equal opportunities for a successful life. However, capitalism is based upon individual effort and motivation to succeed. Education and opportunity are the keys to that perception of capitalistic success. Do as little as possible, depend on the all powerful government to supply your needs, is the belief of the Socialists (similar to the old Ant and Grasshopper tale).

Socialism has rarely worked above the community level, and then only under the worst of circumstances. Survival during the arrival of the Pilgrims in the New World, would be indicative of “communal success” under Socialism, and those who refused to participate were summarily ostracised from the colony, The liberal left would like us to believe that the failure of socialism over two millennia was because, “It wasn’t done right”. Not done right in 2,000 years?? Any rationale for the failure of socialism, must begin with the absence of motivation for the workers, aka: individual laziness, and ineptittude.
YOUR THOUGHTS??















